Facebook Twitter

Download our latest newsletters

PDF Download
April 2019 Newsletter
PDF Download
March 2019 Newsletter
PDF Download
January - February 2019 newsletter
PDF Download
December 2018 Newsletter
PDF Download
November 2018 Newsletter
PDF Download
October 2018 Newsletter
PDF Download
August-September 2018 Newsletter
PDF Download
July 2018 Newsletter
PDF Download
June 2018 Newsletter
PDF Download
April-May 2018 Newsletter
PDF Download
March 2018 Newsletter
PDF Download
February 2018 Newsletter
PDF Download
December-January 2017-18 Newsletter
PDF Download
October-November 2017 Newsletter
PDF Download
September 2017 Newsletter
PDF Download
August 2017 Newsletter
PDF Download
July 2017 Newsletter
PDF Download
June 2017 Newsletter
PDF Download
May 2017 Newsletter
PDF Download
April 2017 Newsletter
PDF Download
March 2017 Newsletter
PDF Download
February 2017 Newsletter
PDF Download
January 2017 Newsletter
PDF Download
December 2016 Newsletter
PDF Download
November 2016 Newsletter
PDF Download
October 2016 Newsletter
PDF Download
September 2016 Newsletter
PDF Download
August 2016 Newsletter
PDF Download
July 2016 Newsletter
PDF Download
June 2016 Newsletter
PDF Download
May 2016 Newsletter
PDF Download
April 2016 Newsletter
PDF Download
March 2016 Newsletter
PDF Download
February 2016 Newsletter
PDF Download
January 2016 Newsletter
PDF Download
November 2015 Newsletter
PDF Download
October 2015 Newsletter
PDF Download
September 2015 Newsletter
PDF Download
August 2015 Newsletter
PDF Download
July 2015 Newsletter
PDF Download
June 2015 Newsletter
PDF Download
May 2015 Newsletter
PDF Download
April 2015 Newsletter
PDF Download
March 2015 Newsletter
PDF Download
February 2015 Newsletter
PDF Download
November 2014 Newsletter
PDF Download
October 2014 Newsletter
PDF Download
September 2014 Newsletter
PDF Download
April May 2014 Newsletter
PDF Download
March 2014 Newsletter
PDF Download
TIS newsletter Oct 2013
PDF Download
TIS newsletter Sept 2013
PDF Download
TIS newsletter Feb 2013
PDF Download
TIS newsletter Jan 2013
PDF Download
TIS newsletter Dec 2012
PDF Download
TIS newsletter Nov 2012
PDF Download
TIS newsletter Oct 2012
PDF Download
Environmental impacts of seabed mining brochure
PDF Download
Te Ipukarea Society Brochure 2017-18
PDF Download
TIS Submission on Draft Seabed Minerals Bill
Above: Coastal protection is critical for low lying atolls like Fakaofo

Tokelau is located 500km north of Samoa and 600km north-west of Pukapuka, where the Cook Islands and Tokelau share a common marine boundary. In fact Pukapuka is twice as close to Fakaofo in Tokelau as it is to Rarotonga. The three atolls of Tokealu are very similar to our own norther group atolls. The atoll nation has a population of about 1500, and a total land area of only 10 sq.km. It is regularly serviced twice a month by a 2 day voyage from Apia, Samoa, and is the first nation in the world to be powered 100% by renewable energy.
In early October Te Ipukarea Society’s Kelvin Passfield travelled to Tokelau from Samoa as a part
of a larger consultation team travelling for the GEF Small Grants Programme. The team travelled on the cargo vessel Fa Sefulu, for consultations on Faka’ofo, Atafu, and Nukunono, the 3 atolls that make up Tokelau. The purpose of Kelvin’s travel was for discussions related to the Australian Government funded Global Environment Facility Small Island Developing States Community Based Adaptation (GEF SIDS CBA) climate change project. This is implemented by the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), and being delivered by Te Ipukarea Society in Tokelau, Niue, and the Cook Islands. The consultation team were ferried ashore at each island for consultations while the cargo was being offloaded, which afforded 6 to 8 hrs on each atoll for discussions and site visits.
Formal meetings were held with the Taupulega (council of elders) on each atoll where Kelvin explained the project and asked for some ideas about possible projects for Tokelau with the available funds. With only about NZ$60,000 available, a decision needs to be made on whether one larger project on one atoll is undertaken, or whether smaller projects could be undertaken covering all atolls.
Possible project ideas discussed related to ecosystem based foreshore protection, improving access to safe drinking water, and improving the quality of the soil to build resilience to the impacts of climate change. There was also a presentation by two biogas experts from Apia on a proposal for a Waste-to-Energy biogas pilot project for Tokelau. This would be based on utilising pig manure and a biodigester to produce methane gas for cooking. The experts, Mr. Usufono Fepuleai, and Ms. Sose Utu-Fepuleai have a successful biogas plant in Apia at the Youth With a Mission (YWAM Campus) that they use for demonstration purposes. Cook Islander Tom Wichman has trialled biogas plants using pig waste in Rarotonga in the past, but apparently there are none functioning currently, possibly due to the down turn in commercial piggeries.
The final decision on which projects will be implemented in Tokelau is dependent on the three Taupulega of Tokelau, with the decision expected early November.
Te Ipukarea Society would like to extend our sincere appreciation to the UNDP Samoa Office, and in particular GEF Small Grants Programme Sub Regional Coordinator Filifilia Iosefa, as well as the Tokelau Apia Liaison Office, and Loia Tausi form the Tokelau Environment Department, for assisting with logistics for the travel. Funding was provided by Australia through the GEF Small Grants Programme Global Grants.

The seaweed washes ashore where it rots and stinks, not a good impression for tourists. Physical removal of seaweed in Muri Lagoon is just a short term solution. The root cause of the nutrients feeding the seaweed need to be addressed

There has been considerable debate about the impacts of tourism on the Cook Islands these few weeks in the local media. We thought it may be timely to document some of Te Ipukarea Society’s activities, and the activities of others, that attempt to reduce the impact of tourism on our little paradise.
As an environmental NGO Te Ipukarea are not antitourism, and in fact tourism and its impacts on the environment are among the reasons we were formed back in 1996. However we are supportive of a more sustainable approach to the development and operations of the industry. Until such an approach is adopted, we agree with Sel Napa’s recent comments that any growth of tourism in its current form needs to be strictly controlled. Our infrastructure needs to catch up with our rapid increase in tourism numbers over the past 10 years, to be able to cope with it. While it is great that Government has major infrastructure projects underway, such as the water project and renewable energy, these projects do not deal with the major tourism related issues affecting our environment
Muri Lagoon is a classic example of what can happen if we do not consider the impact of tourism growth
There has been considerable debate about the impacts of tourism on the Cook Islands these few weeks in the local media. We thought it may be timely to document some of Te Ipukarea Society’s activities, and the activities of others, that attempt to reduce the impact of tourism on our little paradise.
As an environmental NGO Te Ipukarea are not antitourism, and in fact tourism and its impacts on the environment are among the reasons we were formed back in 1996. However we are supportive of a more sustainable approach to the development and operations of the industry. Until such an approach is adopted, we agree with Sel Napa’s recent comments that any growth of tourism in its current form needs to be strictly controlled. Our infrastructure needs to catch up with our rapid increase in tourism numbers over the past 10 years, to be able to cope with it. While it is great that Government has major infrastructure projects underway, such as the water project and renewable energy, these projects do not deal with the major tourism related issues affecting our environment
Muri Lagoon is a classic example of what can happen if we do not consider the impact of tourism growth on our environment. While influx of waste water from inadequate septic systems is not the only cause, there is little doubt that is a significant factor.
We appreciate that the smaller scale tourism (Air BnB type accommodation as Minister Mark Brown pointed out) generally has a lower impact on our environment and major benefits to our local economy as the money earned on these properties, generally stays in country. It is the high density tourism, where anywhere from 3 to 300 accommodation units are squeezed into small coastal sections, that is having the largest impact on our lagoon
The overflowing landfill is another issue that is getting worse, despite recent improvements in the recycling process. Te Ipukarea Society has been promoting a container deposit (refund to consumers upon return of the empty bottles) system for more than 10 years, in order to generate revenue to be able to ship our glass and plastics offshore. We are very pleased to see some promising progress in the past 12 months with support from WATSAN for the progress of the sustainable financing mechanism. This is referred to as an Advanced Disposal Fee (ADF), and will include the refund deposit and a small sum for recycling costs. WATSAN is also working on a policy to ban polystyrene imports for takeaway foods.
Te Ipukarea Society also regularly submit comments on the Environmental Impact Assessments for coastal tourism developments. Typically, our written submissions are that these developments should not proceed unless they can show minimal impact on our environment. These impacts usually relate to sewage disposal and the impact of rock wall revetments on our foreshore. Despite our submissions, invariably the Rarotonga Environment Authority, consisting largely of Members of Parliament from both sides of politics, approve the developments to proceed.
Some tourism operators, including some of the larger resorts, are making a real effort to ensure their hotels, tours and restaurants have minimal impact on our island. For example, they ensure their sewage systems are fully compliant with the regulations, and have an efficient recycling and composting system operating within their own premises, reducing what they have to send to the landfill. A growing number actually make a contribution to the work that Te Ipukarea Society does for our environment, through the Mana Tiaki programme. Unfortunately, others are blindly continuing to operate in favour if their bottom line, the money, with insufficient regard for our Ipukarea. For example, we know several major resorts are digging holes where they burn and bury
their rubbish, rather than pay for it to be taken to the landfill. The managers know they would never get away with that approach in Australia or New Zealand, but here they can, so they do! What is needed is more time, effort and money being channelled by these operators into reducing their current impact on our Little Paradise before we go about encouraging additional numbers of tourists to visit. Hopefully these errant operators can be encouraged to follow the lead of those operators who are utilising a more “island friendly” way of doing business.

Kelvin and Alanna representing BirdLife at the WCPFC-SC, alongside Karen Baird (left) from Forest & Bird (BirdLife in New Zealand)

Te Ipukarea Society staff attended the West and Central Pacific Commission (WCPFC) Scientific Committee meeting which was hosted here in Rarotonga in August by the Ministry of Marine Resources (MMR). As members of Birdlife, which has observer status at the WCPFC, we were fortunate to be able to participate in this scientific forum.

This meeting is where the fishery scientists representing the various members of the WCPFC get together to agree on what scientific advice they should give to the WCPFC managers of the fisheries. The group of fishery managers meet every year in December to agree on how best to manage the various tuna fisheries in the West and Central Pacific Ocean.

Unfortunately, there is not always a consensus on what advice is put forward by the Scientific Committee, as the scientists representing the various fishing nations often have the interests of their fishing fleets influencing their input. For example, this year there was an effort to get agreement on a target exploitation level for South Pacific Albacore, but this has been deferred for another year due to no consensus being reached.

It was quite an environmentally friendly meeting, with large water bottles being used for people to refill their cups or reusable bottles, so there were no piles of empty plastic bottles for the land fill. Also there was very good use of biodegradable coffee cups and plates for the morning and afternoon teas.

Te Ipukarea Society would like to congratulate the team from MMR who have done an excellent job in organising this large meeting of scientists in the Cook Islands.

Liam with some of the other Kuki's on a Tongan reef flat An example of poorly planned development - this mangrove system was killed by placing a road through it

Liam recently commenced a postgraduate certificate in Ridge to Reef Sustainability through Queensland’s James Cook University (JCU), alongside fellow Kuki’s from the Cook Islands National Environment Service and Infrastructure Department. The group travelled to Tonga last week for a postgraduate induction training week, hosted by Secretariat for the Pacific Community (SPC) and run by lecturers from JCU. The postgraduate certificate is a part time course, and students will complete one paper per semester with the aim to complete all four papers by the end of Semester 1, 2019. The study programme was created in order to build the capacity of Pacific Island people from the 14 Pacific Island Countries who are a part of the GEF Pacific Ridge to Reef (R2R) programme. The group of student’s first paper is titled ‘Ridge to Reef Ecosystem Dynamics’.

Some of the Cook Islands contingent who are taking part in the Postgrad Certificate in Ridge to Reef Sustainability.
In Tonga, days usually consisted of morning and afternoon classes, with a field trip around midday. During the class sessions the new students covered the requirements of the assignments they will be working on this semester. Each of the four field trips took the group to a different type of ecosystem, as what better to explain ecosystem dynamics than to visit the sites themselves? Below is a brief summary of the different ecosystems which the group visited.

Day One: Reef Flat Habitat
The team visited this site at low tide to better observe the different biodiversity present. Interesting to note than the animal species and abundance changed as they travelled further from the beach towards the reef. This site predominantly consisted of silty-sandy flats, patches of seagrass, and dense coral groves.

Day Two: Rocky Shore
This site was also protected by a reef and quite calm near the shore. Within the back-reef area, holes in the coral rock (rockpools) turned out to be hotspots for marine biodiversity. There was high wave energy action around the channels and where the reef meets the ocean, which has led to formation of blowholes and other rock sculptures. Biodiversity (particularly coral and seaweed species) was also different in these high energy areas.

Day Three: Mangrove system
Consisted of two sites, one relatively pristine mangrove site at Captain Cook’s landing and another mangrove site which has been partially cleared and replaced by groins in an attempt to create sandy beaches along a coastal road. The important role of mangrove systems as a coastal protection, sediment filter, and animal habitat was also discussed.

Day Four: Port and Urban Development
The team visited the national port and a former mangrove tidal flat which has been cleared and/or cut off from its connection to the sea. Large areas of this coastal area have been filled in with rocks in order to provide solid ground for housing development. A large man-made river has been created to allow water to drain out to sea, while there are also plans to turn the area into a tourist hub including a gold course. The environmental impacts of this infilling and the associated development are uncertain.

Day Five: A special case study
The group visited a large mangrove area which lay in between a village and an area which had agricultural potential. A road was built across the mangrove area to connect the village to the land and provide access to the planting lands. However due to poor design and a lack of understanding of the ecosystem, the road blocked off the flow of salt water to the other side. As a result the mangroves in this area were experiencing severe dieback, particularly one species of mangrove (there were three species in the area, inhabiting different tidal zones). The group learnt that different species of mangroves can tolerate different levels of salinity, which is the reason that one mangrove species died off completely due to the road being built while others did not. The whole habitat could have been protected with a better study of natural processes occurring in the area and engineering to allow water to flow underneath the road.

Meitaki ma’ata to Global Environment Facility (GEF) for funding the Pacific Ridge to Reef Programme, SPC for hosting the event, and NES for the support.

Alanna's wearable arts costume represented the Rimatara Lorikeet (Kura)

Te Ipukarea Society Project officer Alanna Smith, was crowned Miss Cook Islands 2017 on 29th July. During Alanna’s campaign she showcased her Atiuan roots from presenting herself as the female warrior Aketairi through her traditional costume and within the wearable arts section as the endangered (IUCN Red list) Kura bird of Atiu (Rimatara lorikeet). Alanna was also able to promote the work of Te Ipukarea Society during her Q & A sections.

Alanna’s next challenge now as the new Miss Cook Islands is to take on Miss World to be held in Singapore and China in November this year. Alanna will continue to work for Te Ipukarea Society and be a strong advocate for the work that the society does along with raising further awareness around conservation within schools and within communities throughout the Cook Islands.

Liam gets up close with a curious juvenile humpback Liam with the BPM team

Te Ipukarea Society Project Officer Liam Kokaua was fortunate to be able to participate in scientific research of the East Australian Humpback populations in the Great Barrier Reef last week. Here is a summary of his experience:

Humpback whales are a large whale species growing up to 16 metres in length. They often make seasonal migrations across thousands of miles of ocean. There are many distinct Humpback populations around the world and they can be found in all the world’s oceans and in both Northern and Southern Hemispheres. The population we were studying were the East Australian Humpback (EAH) sub-stock, which is a part of the wider South West Pacific population. The EAH sub-stock travel from the cold waters off Antarctica where they feed on food such as krill, to the warm and calm waters within the Great Barrier Reef to breed and give birth.

The history of this population is one of tragedy as well as resilience. After traditional whaling in the 18th and 19th centuries, followed by the highly efficient “scientific” whaling by Russia in the 20th Century, there was estimated to be only 200 whales left from an original number of approximately 30,000. However since whaling pressure was reduced in the 1970’s their numbers have grown exponentially to an estimated 30,000 (similar to their historic numbers), and their numbers are still increasing! Other populations in the South West Pacific have not been able to rebound so quickly and in some areas their continued existence into the future is uncertain.

Working with the Blue Planet Marine team (BPM) aboard the vessel Flying Fish V I was able to learn first-hand how to collect scientific data from humpbacks. This included:

• How to spot humpback whales and identify their behaviour from a distance (exhalation, breaching, pectoral fin and fluke slapping etc.)
• How to take high quality identification photos of dorsal fins and tail flukes which are used to identify individuals
• Learning how to determine the social structure of a pod (i.e mother and calf, male ‘escorts’, a ‘competitive pod’ of males chasing a female, and so on).
• Learning how to take biopsy (DNA) data, which includes retrieving sloughed skin (dead skin which whales leave on the surface of the water), and taking live tissue samples, which requires firing a small dart which collects a small amount of tissue from the whale
• Recording underwater whale song and other social sounds through use of a hydrophone

The biopsy data is useful for building our understanding of humpback whales for a number of reasons, but one of special interest for us in the Cooks is trying to identify whether the whales in the EAH sub-stock have genetic overlap with the sub-stocks which visit the South Pacific. There is a belief amongst some whale researchers that the whales which visit the GBR may also be a part of the sub-stocks which visit the South Pacific Islands, which includes Tonga, Niue, and our own whales here in the Cook Islands.

Thanks to the BPM team for having me on board during the six days, and for teaching me so many crucial skills for marine mammal research. Thanks also to the International Fund for Animal Welfare (IFAW) for covering the costs of my participation on this research project. I feel I have learnt a lot about Humpbacks and marine mammals in general and look forward to being able to use these skills I have learnt again in the future here in the Cook Islands, as well as better advocate for the wellbeing and conservation policy for marine mammals here in the Cook Islands as well as the wider Oceania region.

Tuna catche statistics from different spatial zones in the Cook Islands

At the 43rd Pacific Leaders Forum in 2012 Prime Minister Henry Puna formally launched the Cook Islands Marine Park. Now, 5 years later, it is time for the Cook Islands Government to finally make a decision on what sort of marine park we are going to have for our Marae Moana. We have heard that at the next sitting of Cabinet, on this coming Tuesday the 14th March, the Prime Minister and five MPs that make up this powerful group of decision makers will be having a very important discussion. These six individuals will decide what the size of the exclusion zones for foreign fishing boats in our Marae Moana Marine Park should be. We do hope the Ministers have been provided, and read, all the information they need to help with their decision.

As has been reported earlier, our Prime Minister has promised 50 nautical mile exclusion zones around all islands at several international meetings in recent years, including at Secretary Kerry’s State Department Ocean Conference, on June 17 2014. However, pressure from the Ministry of Marine Resources is apparently making him have second thoughts. And crunch time is approaching!

The Ministry of Marine Resources (MMR) has been actively pushing for only 24 nautical miles exclusion zones. They also tell us they have consulted with the northern group about how big these no foreign fishing zones will be. However we now know that in fact the people were told that the protection zones would be increased from 12 miles to 24 miles. Options for larger zones were not discussed at all. Meanwhile we believe some of the outer islands consulted recently by our traditional leaders in the southern group have said they prefer 100 nautical mile zones not 24, in order to protect their fishing livelihoods.

If people of the Cook Islands want to have a say about the size of foreign fishing exclusion zones around our islands, now would be a good time to do so.

Information to help inform the choice includes:

• 1 nautical mile is 1.84km, or nearly double the distance of 1 kilometer, so don’t get confused!

• 24nm protected zones around each of our 15 islands = about 6% of our EEZ protected, with 94% still available to foreign fishing boats.
• 50 nautical mile zones = about 20% of our EEZ protected, with 80% still available to foreign fishing boats
• 50 nautical mile around all, but 100 nautical mile around Suwarrow, our National Park, = 25% protected, with about 75% avaiable to foreign fishing boats
• 100nm around each islands = about 45% of our EEZ protected, with 55% available to foreign fishing boats.

In all four cases mentioned above, the majority (over 50%) of Cook Islands EEZ will still remain open to foreign fishing vessels.

The Secretary for Marine Resources claims that if we have closed zones larger than 24 miles, the foreign fishery cannot survive and we will lose the money we are currently receiving from fishing licences. This is not true, as can be determined from a 2015 report prepared by the Secretariat for the Pacific Community (SPC) for MMR. This report was only made available because of the Purse Seine Select Committee process late last year. The graphs in the picture from p.5 of this report show that most of the tuna is caught in the 100-200km zone (further than 50 nautical miles from the islands). Note the scale on the horizontal for each graph is different for each zone, so read the numbers on the horizontal scale (bottom of each graph) to see how much fish is caught in each zone.

So, if we close the closer areas, within 50 miles, for example, the foreign boats will have to fish further away from the islands, in locations where they are still catching most of their fish. This is unlikely to have an impact on their catches, and the Government can still collect fisheries licence revenue as they do now. Meanwhile, as the fish within that 50 mile zone will no longer be caught by foreign boats, some of these will eventually migrate closer to the islands, which will be great for local fishermen.

If you feel strongly about this issue you could contact Cabinet, and your own Member of Parliament, letting them know your preference, 24, 50, or 100 miles. That will, hopefully, help guide their discussion on Tuesday (14th March 2017).

Contact email addresses for cabinet ministers
aukino.tairea@cookislands.gov.ck (Secretary to Cabinet)

An online dictionary defines a petrol head as a person who is overly reliant on the use of their car, resisting any suggestion to use other means of transport. As readers will know from our articles in the past, that hardly sounds like a description of an employee of Te Ipukarea Society, as we actively promote cycling and electric vehicles as a preferred means of transport. However, it seems we do now have our very own Petrel Head!

Petrels are tube-nosed seabirds, and a number of different petrel species are known from the Cook Islands. In order to learn more about these birds, and how to survey them, Te Ipukarea Society project officer Alanna Smith has recently spent 2 weeks on Little Barrier Island off Auckland with a number of petrel experts, an experience she says she will never forget. This is her story.

I had never been to an island that was solely dedicated to being a nature reserve, so I could tell right from the beginning that this was going to be quite the experience. Little Barrier Islands lies 80 km north of Auckland city on the outer edge of the Hauraki Gulf. It is one of New Zealand’s pest-free nature reserves, free of all introduced predators except wasps. This makes it a very important sanctuary for many of New Zealand’s threatened and native species including the Kiwi, Kakapo and Tuatara. You can only travel to Little Barrier Island on an authorised vessel, a permit from DOC to land on the island is also required, along with a strict bio-security check of all clothing and items being brought onto the island.

Once I had finally arrived onto LBI after an hour’s boat ride from sand-spit harbour, it did not take long to realise I really was in a garden of Eden. Straight away I could see the Kaka and Kakariki birds flying overhead, the Tui and Bell birds were trying to out sing each other and of course seeing the Kokako bouncing across the ground like lambs was very special to see.

My first week got off to an intense start. Having to retrieve 20 odd acoustic recorders scattered across LBI rugged terrain was quite the challenge, not to mention the rows of cutty grass we had to push through to get to them. We don’t have this awful cutty grass back home so of course my first two surveys saw myself wearing shorts and a singlet, as I would have done so back home. This outfit was quickly changed for the remanding surveys.

During that first week, I was also introduced to the NZ Black Petrel. I got a real hands-on experience holding these big seabirds and carefully learnt how to direct them in and out of their burrows. After handling the bird, banding it if needed and checking its nest for eggs or chicks I was surprised that when putting the bird back in its burrow it did not turn around and attack us for messing with its nest and manhandling it. I just assumed it would have, as I haven’t had great experiences with our local chickens at home.

My second week on the island involved conducting a survey on the NZ Storm Petrel. The NZ Storm Petrel was thought to be extinct back in 2003 until it was rediscovered in 2013 by a local fisherman. It was interesting to see how the NZ Storm petrel were caught, which involved the use of high beam lights, mesmerising the small petrel bird towards the ground. It was great to see the little NZ Storm petrel up close. They were a very quiet bird and did not screech once when they were being banded or measured. I had the important role of placing these little Storm petrels into their new manmade burrows.

Walking by myself in the dark to these burrows some 200 odd meters away however did come with some interesting encounters that I’d never forget. For instance, one encounter involved a mysterious flying bird, which flew onto my back as I was walking back to the rest of my team. I got the shock of my life and started running for about 20 m, and then proceeded at a fast walk back to my work colleagues who had no idea of the commotion I had just been through. My second encounter however occurred as I was walking towards the burrows and saw what I thought was a kiwi but turned out to be a Kakapo, right there in the open cut grass area, a good 3 m away from me. We both stood still for a good 8 seconds before the Kakapo realised I had actually spotted her, she then darted off into the nearby bush.

After having arrived back home I’m now looking forward to utilizing my skills learnt on LBI, particularly those skills on the Black Petrel Survey. For instance, (funding dependent) I hope to potentially work on a new project that will involve the surveying and monitoring of the Herald petrel population, which can be found on the Maungatea Bluff on Rarotonga. Knowing so little about this species on Rarotonga is a major obstacle in terms of formulating a conservation plan, if in fact one were needed. There has been little recent activity in terms of seabird projects within the Cook Islands. So, with my new passion and drive for seabird conservation, I hope to jumpstart a bit more excitement within this area, particularly among our youth. A very big thank you to the Arcadia Foundation for supporting my travel costs, and of course to Chris Gaskin from Northern New Zealand Seabird Trust for the training opportunity and Dan Burgin from Wildlife Management International (NZ) for being patient with me during these tiring hikes and showing me the ways around Black Petrel handling and surveying.

Front line staff member Talei Samuels from Muri Beachcomber has been our top Mana Tiaki donation collector for the past three month. For Talei’s awesome efforts she received an Aitutaki day tour trip for two thanks to one of our awesome Mana Tiaki sponsors Air Rarotonga!
December is when our next top donation collector will be named and will be awarded with a pass for two to splash out with the team from Koka Lagoon Cruises, discover our marine life with Raro Reef Sub, enjoy the island with the crew from Storytellers Eco Cycle Tours and of course some scuba fun with the Big Fish dive centre.

Meitaki Maata to all our participating Mana Tiaki accommodations who have signed up with the programme along with our new accommodations who have also jumped on board to be a Mana Tiaki Guardian and of course leading the way in ‘Protecting a little paradise’.

Check out our newly completed conservation documentary/ Management Plan for the Tanga’eo (Mangaian Kingfisher), created for the community of Mangaia.

We thank Mangaia School, Jason Tuara, Allan Tuara, Taoi Nooroa, Anthony Whyte, and the many members of the Mangaia Community who have supported the Tanga’eo Project, as well as Carinna Langsford, Teresa Arneric and Ian Karika from Te Ipukarea Society who were involved in the earlier stages of the project.
And of course the Aage V. Jensen Foundation and BirdLife International for funding the project.

Link below:


Read more of our news ...

Page 2 of 16 Previous Next